| |
Abstract/Syllabus:
|
Dubai, one of the locations where G-Lab has taken students. (Image courtesy of gorbulas_sandybanks on Flickr.)
Course Description
Entrepreneurship in the 21st century is evolving. Because of global changes in technology, communications, and capital markets, today's innovative startups are building successful companies in countries around the globe, in many instances with investors, vendors, customers, and employees located thousands of miles away. The challenges these leading-edge companies face, particularly in emerging markets, are some of the most sophisticated issues both for businesses and governments alike. These challenges are the focus of G-Lab.
Syllabus
Course Goals
Entrepreneurship in the 21st century is evolving. Because of global changes in technology, communications, and capital markets, today's innovative startups are building successful companies in countries around the globe, in many instances with investors, vendors, customers, and employees located thousands of miles away. The challenges these leading-edge companies face, particularly in emerging markets, are some of the most sophisticated issues both for businesses and governments alike. These challenges are the focus of G-Lab.
G-Lab has four specific goals:
- To familiarize students with the issues and challenges facing global entrepreneurs.
- To provide students with an intensive internship experience working in a "global" startup.
- To familiarize students with the power of informal networks and the importance of leveraging MIT-related and other networks while working globally. In addition to helping you deliver a better product to your host companies, learning to use a rich set of informal networks effectively is a powerful personal resource as well.
- To offer high-quality advice for global companies. We would like MIT Sloan to become the first place that global startups look for advice and help. This is an important goal for you, MIT, and all future generations of MIT students.
Course Design and Expectations
G-Lab is both a course and a collaboration: a partnership between MIT Sloan and entrepreneurial companies facing real challenges throughout the world. MIT's and Sloan's reputations are very much at stake here. Future students will only get this kind of opportunity if G-Lab continues to provide value to everyone involved.
Please note that faculty and other advisors to the course have devoted considerable time and resources in finding appropriate projects. This includes assessing whether there is a good fit between what you can contribute and what the entrepreneurs need. As a result, both sides have invested heavily in this relationship.
Please regard everything we ask you to do as a work assignment (i.e., as if from an employer) rather than as a course requirement. Everything in this course is designed to help you work effectively with your projects. There is no make-work or irrelevant material; all of the requirements have been designed solely to help you and your team to be effective. If you need more content on any issue, talk with us and we will make sure you get what you need, as quickly and easily as possible. Moreover, if there is anything that you do not understand about the course structure and requirements, please speak with the faculty.
Course Requirements
The requirements for the course and the contribution of each towards the final grade are as follows:
Grading criteria.
COMPONENTS |
INDIVIDUAL VS TEAM |
CONTRIBUTION TO FINAL GRADE |
DEADLINES |
Two case write-ups (10% each) |
Individual |
20% |
The night before the case is discussed in class |
Class participation (based on in-class contributions and feedback from your host company) |
Individual |
25% |
Ongoing, throughout the course |
Project workplan |
Team |
15% |
Workplan due to faculty by Ses #12
Sign-off from your host company by Ses #14
|
Remote (MIT-based) internship and interim research report |
Team |
20% |
Report due to faculty by Ses #20 and to your host company by Ses #24 |
On-site internship, final research report, and poster |
Team |
20% |
Presentation to your host company at the end of the on-site internship
Report due to faculty by one week following end of internship
Poster due 10 days following end of internship
|
These course requirements are described in more detail in the assignments section.
Logistics and Teamwork
G-Lab will entail extensive teamwork. You need to build a team with diverse and complementary skills. This is the key to success in your internship. Think carefully about the people you want to work with (and even temporarily live with) and how you will allocate responsibilities within your team. We will help you as much as possible, but ultimately team selection and operation is your responsibility. This activity is not graded directly, but it will have a major effect on your performance throughout the course.
- Team Formation process:
- To facilitate team building, please register and post your resumes no later than Ses #3. We need your resumes in order to send them to your host company after the match, and you may need them as you form your team.
- Teams should be formed of students in the same section. This is to ensure that every team can meet together for 90 minutes twice a week, without anyone missing.
- On the day of Ses #5, one week before bid forms are due, there will be an in-class mixer to give you an opportunity to find or complete your team.
- Please note that most of the questionnaires include a section asking for required or requested skill sets or background, including language. As you review questionnaires, bear in mind the requirements that the host companies have laid out. They will carry great weight in the match process.
- Bidding and Match process:
- The postings consist of questionnaires that have been prepared and submitted by the host companies. They contain substantial background information on the projects and the proposed focus for a G-Lab team. Each project is under the supervision of one of the G-Lab faculty; there may also be additional project advisors. Each project will also report directly to one TA.
- If you have questions regarding the proposed project, please request that the appropriate faculty or TA contact the host company. You should not contact any company until matching is complete.
- After a thorough review of all projects, your team should begin ranking its preferred projects. As noted above, where host companies have laid out skill requirements or requests, faculty will give great weight to those requests.
- On your hard-copy bidding form, your team will rank 3 projects in order of preference. You will also submit copies of your resumes, as well as a short persuasive statement summarizing the strengths and merit of your bid requests.
- The match process is confidential, and conducted by the faculty. Their decisions are final. Historically, a high percentage of teams are matched with their first or second choice.
- Dates: Bid forms are available one day before Ses #4. Forms must be submitted in hard copy on the day of Ses #7. Results will be announced and emailed on the day of Ses #8.
- Post-Match process (teamwork during the fall):
- After the match process is complete, your team will be notified which host company you have been matched with. Your team should send its acceptance of your project immediately by return email. We will then forward your resumes to the host company, and give them the same opportunity to accept your team. As soon as we notify you that your host company has accepted your team, you should set up your initial call and commence work with them.
- Each team will work with a specific faculty member as an advisor to the team on both substantive and procedural issues. Your team will also be supported by one of the TAs. Your team will meet with its advisor periodically over the fall, usually biweekly, to measure and monitor progress. Meetings may be scheduled during designated class time or outside of class.
- While your advisors will remain available to you, your team will own its relationship with the host company, and will be responsible for negotiating and managing all aspects of the work plan and the project, during the fall and IAP.
- Please note that no team has an automatic right to travel to the internship in January. The internship must be earned through diligent and appropriate presentation. A "go/no go" decision will be made by faculty in December. As in past years, some teams may in fact not travel.
Calendar
Course calendar.
SES # |
TOPICS |
KEY DATES |
Part I: The global environment for entrepreneurship |
1 |
Course overview and introduction |
|
2 |
Issues for entrepreneurs in developing markets |
|
3 |
How entrepreneurial companies respond to corruption |
Resumes posted |
4 |
Opportunities amid extreme unpredictability |
|
5 |
Team-building mixer
|
|
6 |
How the government shapes the entrepreneurial environment |
|
7 |
Legal environments and IP protection |
G-Lab bidding forms due in class |
Part II: The challenges facing entrepreneurial firms |
8 |
Working in a G-Lab project |
Company matches announced |
9 |
Life sciences overview, biotech entrepreneurship |
|
10 |
Internationalization |
|
11 |
Team meetings
|
|
12 |
You are not alone |
Team workplans due in class |
13 |
Research methods
Team meetings
|
|
14 |
Global sales strategies for ambitious entrepreneurs |
Teams obtain and submit workplan sign-offs from host companies |
15 |
Being an entrepreneur |
|
16 |
Team meetings |
|
17 |
Entrepreneurial finance
|
|
18 |
Team meetings with faculty advisors |
|
19 |
Investigation and analysis |
|
20 |
Commercialization |
Interim research reports due in class |
21 |
Team meetings with faculty advisors |
|
22 |
Organizational development and human resource management |
|
23 |
Best practices overview |
|
24 |
Building trust |
Teams submit interim research reports to host companies |
Part III: The internship and final reports |
25 |
Following month: G-Lab internship |
|
26 |
One week following end of internship: Faculty meetings |
Final report due
Copy or summary of company deliverables due
|
27 |
10 days following end of internship: G-Lab poster session |
Teams prepare posters on their projects and submit electronic copies to faculty |
|
|
|
Further Reading:
|
This section contains documents that could not be made accessible to screen reader software. A "#" symbol is used to denote such documents.
Help support MIT OpenCourseWare by shopping at Amazon.com! MIT OpenCourseWare offers direct links to Amazon.com to purchase the books cited in this course. Click on the Amazon logo to the left of any citation and purchase the book from Amazon.com, and MIT OpenCourseWare will receive up to 10% of all purchases you make. Your support will enable MIT to continue offering open access to MIT courses. |
Course readings.
SES # |
TOPICS |
READINGS |
Part I: The global environment for entrepreneurship |
1 |
Course overview and introduction |
Required
French, Howard W., and Lydia Polgreen. "Entrepreneurs from China Flourish in Africa." The New York Times, August 18, 2007, Late Edition, sec. A1.
McMillan, John, and Christopher Woodruff. "The Central Role of Entrepreneurs in Transition Economies." Journal of Economic Perspectives 16, no. 3 (2002): 153-170.
Baumol, William. "Entrepreneurship: Productive, Unproductive, and Destructive." Journal of Political Economy 98, no. 5 (1990): 893-921.
Recommended
Polgreen, Lydia, and Howard W. French. "China's Trade in Africa Carries a Price Tag." The New York Times, August 21, 2007, Late Edition, sec. A1.
|
2 |
Issues for entrepreneurs in developing markets |
Required
Beleza Natural: Choosing the Right Growth Model - MIT Case
Wilson, Dominique, and Roopa Purushothaman. "Dreaming with BRICs: The Path to 2050." Goldman Sachs, Global Economics Paper No. 99, 2003.
Acemoglu, Daron, Simon Johnson, and James A. Robinson. "Institutions as a Fundamental Cause of Long-Run Growth." In Handbooks in Economics. Vol. 1, Handbook of Economic Growth. Edited by Philippe Aghion and Seven N. Durlauf. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: North Holland, 2005, sections 1, 5, 6, and 8. ISBN: 9780444508379.
Recommended
World Bank. "Doing Business 2007: How to Reform. Comparing Regulation in 175 Economies." 2007.
World Bank. "Doing Business in Brazil." 2007.
|
3 |
How entrepreneurial companies respond to corruption |
Required
Fisman, Raymond. "Estimating the Value of Political Connections." American Economic Review 91, no. 4 (2001): 1095-1102.
Recommended
Kaufmann, Daniel, Aart Kraay, and Massimo Mastruzzi. "Governance Matters V: Aggregate and Individual Governance Indicators for 1996-2005." World Bank, 2006. (PDF)#
Kaufmann, Daniel, Aart Kraay, and Massimo Mastruzzi. "Governance Matters V: Appendices." World Bank, 2006.
|
4 |
Opportunities amid extreme unpredictability |
Reqiured
McMillan, John, and Christopher Woodruff. "The Central Role of Entrepreneurs in Transition Economies." Journal of Economic Perspectives 16, no. 3 (2002): 153-170. Review the section on "Entrepreneurs' Strategies."
Introduction to Carbon Market. Read in particular "Carbon ABC" material (including relevant links to "Kyoto Protocol" and "Flexible Mechanisms").
Review Core Carbon Group .
"Renaissance Capital Led $300 Million Equity Offering by Nigeria's United Bank for Africa." Renaissance Capital, News and Press Releases, April 18, 2007.
Prince, Todd. "Renaissance Capital Founder Jennings Plans to Double Investment in Africa." Business Report, May 31, 2007.
Recommended
Granville, Christopher, and Alexey Zabotkin. "Lessons of a Decade." Russia: Equity Strategy. United Financial Group and Deutsche Bank, September 5, 2005.
Review UN website on carbon market, particularly the Essential Background tab.
Tsepliaeva, Julia, and Anastasia Levashova. "Russia: The Middle Class." Emerging Markets Economics and Strategy: Russia and CIS. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc., August 29, 2007.
|
5 |
Team-building mixer |
|
6 |
How the government shapes the entrepreneurial environment |
Huang, Yasheng. "Why is Entrepreneurship Missing in Shanghai?" Paper prepared for the National Bureau of Economic Research pre-conference on "International Differences in Entrepreneurship." May 11, 2007. |
7 |
Legal environments and IP protection |
Required
MacFarquhar, Larissa. "Bag Man: Cracking Down on Fashion Fakes." The New Yorker, March 19, 2007, 126-137.
McMillan, John, and Christopher Woodruff. "Private Order under Dysfunctional Public Order." Michigan Law Review 98, no. 8 (2000): 2421-2458.
Recommended
Johnson, Simon, John McMillan, and Christopher Woodruff. "Property Rights and Finance." American Economic Review 92, no. 5 (2002): 1335-1356.
McMillan, John, and Christopher Woodruff. "Dispute Prevention Without Courts in Vietnam." Journal of Law, Economics and Organization 15, no. 3 (1999): 637-658.
|
Part II: The challenges facing entrepreneurial firms |
8 |
Working in a G-Lab project |
Compsis at a Crossroads - MIT Case |
9 |
Life sciences overview, biotech entrepreneurship |
Required
Biocon - MIT Case
Ferrer, Marcela, Halla Thorsteinsdóttir, Uyen Quach, Peter A. Singer, and Abdallah S. Daar. "The Scientific Muscle of Brazil's Health Biotechnology." Nature Biotechnology 22 (2004): DC8-DC12.
Kumar, Nandini K, Uyen Quach, Halla Thorsteinsdóttir, Hemlatha Somsekhar, Abdallah S Daar, and Peter A Singer. "Indian Biotechnology: Rapidly Evolving and Industry Led." Nature Biotechnology 22 (2004): DC31-DC36.
|
10 |
Internationalization |
Required
Spoleto Culinaria Italiana - MIT Case
Color/9 - Tatitos - MIT Case
Ramamurti, Ravi, and Jitendra V. Singh. 2007. "Generic Strategies of India's Emerging Multinationals." Paper prepared for the Northeastern University-Wharton School conference on "Emerging Multinationals from Emerging Markets" held at Northeastern University, June 22-23, 2007. Read all sections from "Emerging Indian Multinationals" to "Pathways for Strategy Migration."
|
11 |
Team meetings |
|
12 |
You are not alone |
Required
El-Qorchi, Mohammed. "The Hawala System." Finance and Development 39, no. 4 (2002).
McMillan, John, and Christopher Woodruff. "Interfirm Relationships and Informal Credit in Vietnam." Quarterly Journal of Economics 114, no. 4 (1999): 1285-1320.
Saxenian, Anna Lee. "Introduction." Chapters 7-8 in The New Argonauts: Regional Advantage in a Global Economy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2007. ISBN: 9780674025660.
|
13 |
Research methods
Team meetings
|
|
14 |
Global sales strategies for ambitious entrepreneurs |
Kuemmerle, Walter, and Chad Ellis. "Spotfire: Managing a Multinational Start-Up." Harvard Business School Case. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Publishing. Case: 9-899-078, October 12, 1998. |
15 |
Being an entrepreneur |
|
16 |
Team meetings |
|
17 |
Entrepreneurial finance |
|
18 |
Team meetings with faculty advisors |
|
19 |
Investigation and analysis |
|
20 |
Commercialization |
Christensen, Clayton M., and Scott D. Anthony. "Making SMaL Big: SMaL Camera Technologies." Harvard Business School Case. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Publishing. Case: 9-603-116, March 24, 2003.
CASE HTS-110 - MIT Case
Required
Christensen, Clayton M., Scott D. Anthony, Gerald Berstell, and Denise Nitterhouse. "Finding the Right Job for Your Product." Sloan Management Review 48, no. 3 (2007): 38-47.
|
21 |
Team meetings with faculty advisors |
|
22 |
Organizational development and human resource management |
Paine, Lynn Sharp, Carin-Isabel Knoop, and Suma Raju. "Wipro Technologies (A)." Harvard Business School Case. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Publishing. Case: 9-301-043, February 7, 2001.
Applegate, Lynda M., and Kirk Goldman. "Internet Securities, Inc.: Building a Business in Turbulent Times (A)." Harvard Business School Case. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Publishing. Case: 9-398-007, September 24, 1997.
Required
Rai, Sharita. "Outsourcers Struggling to Keep Workers in the Fold." The New York Times, November 12, 2005.
Baron, James N., Michael T. Hannan, and M. Diane Burton. "Labor Pains: Organizational Change and Employee Turnover in Young, High-Tech Firms." American Journal of Sociology 106, no. 4 (2001): 960-1012.
"Capturing Talent." The Economist, August 18-24, 2007.
Recommended
Burton, M. Diane. "The Company They Keep: Founders' Models for Organizing New Firms." In The Entrepreneurship Dynamic: Origins of Entrepreneurship and the Evolution of Industries. Edited by Claudia B. Schoonhoven and Elaine Romanelli. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press, 2001. ISBN: 9780804737906.
|
23 |
Best practices overview |
|
24 |
Building trust |
Required
Locke, Richard M. "Building Trust." Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, San Francisco, CA, September 1, 2001.
|
Part III: The internship and final reports |
25 |
Following month: G-Lab internship |
|
26 |
One week following end of internship: Faculty meetings |
|
27 |
10 days following end of internship: G-Lab poster session |
|
|
|
|
Rating:
0 user(s) have rated this courseware
Views:
21546
|
|
|
|
|